CO129-100 - Sir Robinson - 1864 [9] — Page 230

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

222

is not only to retain and place in a connected form the provisions relative to the subjects to which they respectively addressed but also to prevent the necessity of introducing into the new edition of Ordinances more exactments there or convenient are necessary.

Section 5 is self-explanatory and is merely intended to supply an omission in Ordinance No. 7 of 1862.

Sections 6 and 7 are intended to replace the corresponding Sections of the "Bankruptcy Ordinance 1864" which were recommended for alteration, in your Despatch No. 107 of the 20th July last; care has been taken to render these sections free from the objections attributed to them.

Section 8 merely gives effect to the "Bankruptcy Ordinance 1884" as passed; the present clause having been omitted due to a mistake in the printing.

The intention of the Legislative Council in passing the last Section needs explanation.

At a recent trial in this Colony (R. v. Browning) the matter of which had its origin in Japan, it appeared that a "warning" to

Edit History

2026-05-19 07:51:59 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

J 222 is not only to retain and place in a connected form the provisions relative to the subjects to which they respectively addressed but also to prevent the necessity of introducing into the new edition of Ordinances more exactments there or convenient are necessary. Section 5 is self-explanatory and is merely intended to supply an omission in Ordinance No. 7 of 1862. Sections 6 and 7 are intended to replace the corresponding Sections of the "Bankruptcy Ordinance 1864" which were recommended for alteration, in your Despatch No. 107 of the 20th July last; care has been taken to render these sections free from the objections attributed to them. Section 8 merely gives effect to the "Bankruptcy Ordinance 1884" as passed; the present clause having been omitted due to a mistake in the printing. The intention of the Legislative Council in passing the last Section needs explanation. At a recent trial in this Colony (R. v. Browning) the matter of which had its origin in Japan, it appeared that a "warning" to

Baseline (Original)

J 222 is not only to retain and place in a connected form the provisions relative to the subjects to which they respectively addressed but also to prevent the necessity of introducing into the new are edition of Odinances more exactinents there or Convenient are necessary Section 5 is self explanatory and is merely intended to supply an omission in Ordinance N. 7 71862. 1862. Sections 6 and I are intended to replace the corresponding Sections of the "Bankruptcy Ordinance 1864" which were recommended for alteration, in your Despatch N. 107 of the 20th July last care has been taken to render there sections free from the objections attributed to them Section 8 merely gives to the "Bankruptcy Ordinance 1884" as passed; the present clause having been omitted effect mistake in the printing. The intention 斥 Legislative in parsing the the last Section needs explanation. At a recent trial in this Colony (R. v. Browning) the matter of which had its origin in Japan, it appeared that a "warning" to

2026-05-19 07:51:59 · Baseline

View content

222

is not only to retain and place in a connected form the provisions relative to the subjects to which they

respectively addressed but also to prevent the necessity of introducing into the new

are

edition

Odinances more

exactinents there

or Convenient

are necessary

Section 5 is self explanatory

and is merely intended to supply an omission in Ordinance N. 7 71862.

1862.

Sections 6 and I are

intended to replace the corresponding Sections of the "Bankruptcy Ordinance 1864" which were

recommended for alteration, in your Despatch N. 107 of the 20th July last care has been taken to render there sections free from

the objections attributed to them

Section 8 merely gives to the "Bankruptcy Ordinance 1884" as passed; the present clause having been omitted

effect

mistake in the printing.

The intention

斥

Legislative in parsing

the

the last

Section needs explanation.

a recent trial in this Colony (R. v. Browning) the matter of which had its origin in Japan,

CO129-100 - Sir Robinson - 1864 [9] — Page 230

Edit History

Comments

Private Research Note